|
|
|
Leading Decisions
- D.C.Circuit-8-6-07
Terminally ill have no right to drugs, without FDA say-so. 
- Ackerson, Superior crt. No. 2003 1 00028 5, November 13, 2006.
- State of Wash v. Hanson
In a published opinion, Division III
holds that a medical marijuana patient who
obtained and presented to police written authorization
the day after his motel room was raided
(when he was not present) satisfied the requirements
of the Medical Use of Marijuana Act.
Conviction reversed, case dismissed.
- Wa State v. Ginn
128 Wn App 872 (Div II, Aug. '05)
(EVIDENCE OF
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE MUST BE
INTERPRETED IN LIGHT MOST FAVORABLE TO
DEFENSE) 
- Wa State v. Phelps
118 Wn App 740 (Div II, 2003); 77 P3d 678
(WRITTEN
DESIGNATION OF PRIMARY CAREGIVER MUST
PREDATE POLICE CONTACT)
- ADA Workplace Protection for MMJ Patients
- Appeals Court Rules Against Indian Reservation
- Schedule I v. Medical uses
- Pre SB420 MMJ collectives endangered by ruling:
The People of, Plaintiff and Respondent V Michael C. Uzriceanu, Defendant and Appellant
- WA State v. Shepherd
- Conant v. Walters
- Gonzales, Attorney General v. Raich
- OR State v. Kama
- US v. Kama
- "Medical Necessity" defense abrogated by mmj statute?
- State's Motion for Reconsideration
WA State v. Ginn (STATE'S PETITION FOR REV. DENIED, JULY 06)
- Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon, Washburn v. Columbia Forest Products
- Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon, Respondent, v. Bryan Gene Miles, Appellant.
- Washington State vs Tracy (Court of Appeals)
Washington State Supreme Court upholds conviction in medical marijuana case:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420AP_WA_Medical_Marijuana.html.
The majority and dissenting opinions can be accessed here: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.showOpinion&filename=775346MAJ, and here: http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/index.cfm?fa=opinions.showOpinion&filename=775346Di1.
.pdf versions can be downloaded at those pages.
- State V. Tracy (Wa. State Supremes, 11/06)
PHYSICIAN MUST BE "LICENSED" IN WASH.
"FULL FAITH & CREDIT" DEFERRED
Tracy opinion - Johnson dissent
Tracy opinion - majority
- Ackerson, Superior crt. No. 2003 1 00028 5, November 13, 2006.
Tracy opinion - majority
- Housing case with MMJ issues
- Gonzales v. Oregon (Oregon Death With Dignity Act)
- People V Russell
- US v Ed Rosenthal - Ninth Circuit decision
-
Hemp VS DEA
- Wash Case: Div. II (caregiver must care?)
WA State VS Steven Matthew Mullins
-
Religious use of controlled substances
If you are having trouble viewing the .pdf files
click here to download a free copy of Acrobat Reader. |
If you are having trouble viewing the MS Word files
click here to download a free copy of MS Word Viewer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information provided at this site is not a substitute for legal advice, and
should not be construed to create an attorney-client relationship. The general information
provided here may not apply to individual circumstances, and should be interpreted
and applied by a qualified, and licensed attorney.
For the convenience of our readers, we try to provide a wide variety of Internet
links to sites containing opinions and information about related medical/legal/social/political
issues. While we hope you find them useful, we neither endorse them, nor screen
them for accuracy. There is no substitute for the direct advice of your attorney,
doctor, or appropriate qualified professional.
|
|
|
